US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Churchwell v. WTVA, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
Reggie Churchwell
Defendant:
WTVA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B.J. v. Hornsby et al
as 1:2010cv00206
Plaintiff:
B.J.
Defendant:
Jamar Hornsby, Darrell Simmons and Robert Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DePriest v. Harmer
as 1:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Donald R. DePriest
Defendant:
Peter S. Harmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Sears, Roebuck And Co. et al
as 1:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
Rosie Perry
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck And Co. and Vanessa Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Peoples v. Raybestos Products Company et al
as 4:2008cv00075
Plaintiff:
Shavone L. Peoples and Shavone L. Peoples
Defendant:
Raybestos Products Company and Greg Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lane v. Advance Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
Steve Lane
Defendant:
Advance Stores, Inc. and Jim Godbold
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Scott v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation
as 2:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
Marilyn W. Scott and Marilyn W. Scott
Defendant:
Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation and Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Isaac v. Desoto County Metro Narcotics Unit
as 2:2007cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaac
Defendant:
Desoto County Metro Narcotics Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 2:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Smith
Defendant:
nmi Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Raney v. Martin
as 3:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Holloman M. Raney, Holloman M. Raney and Holloman M. Raney
Defendant:
Harley Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
