US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 201 - 210 of 17,505
Mathis v. U S America
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
U S America and MDOC Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Bryant
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jayla Bryant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Roberson
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wilmesia Roberson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dymon Moore and Gassey Williams
Defendant:
The City of Columbus and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. The Kroger Co et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Kelly, Sr.
Defendant:
The Kroger Co, A1's Xclusive Auto AXA LLC, Nolan Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chism v. Manhattan Life Insurance and Annuity Company
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Bobby W. Chism
Defendant:
Manhattan Life Insurance and Annuity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McPhail v. Lynchard
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Beau McPhail
Defendant:
Percy L. Lynchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wilburn v. Estate of Mary Odell Sims et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Terry Wilburn
Defendant:
Estate of Mary Odell Sims and Jeanette M. Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
