Mississippi Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 197
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Sartin et al
as 3:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Mitzi Sartin and John Does Numbers 1 through 99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Live Face on Web, LLC v. Daryl Lofton Agency, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Live Face on Web, LLC
Defendant:
Daryl Lofton Agency, LLC and Daryl W. Lofton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Live Face on Web, LLC v. Natchez Board of Realtors, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Live Face on Web, LLC
Defendant:
Natchez Board of Realtors, Inc. and Joe W. Stedman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Zuffa, LLC v. Shurden et al
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
John M. Shurden, Angela R. Shurden and Gemini Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Wells
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
John W. Wells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Warnock Engineering, LLC et al v. Canton Municipal Utilities
as 3:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Warnock Engineering, LLC and Rudolph M. Warnock, Jr.
Defendant:
Canton Municipal Utilities
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Cox et al
as 1:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
James B. Cox, Catherine A. Cox, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Altman v. University Press of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00883
Plaintiff:
Suzi Altman
Defendant:
University Press of Mississippi and Haley R. Barbour
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Strickland v. Winfrey et al
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Otisa C. Strickland
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey, Harpo Studios and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cruisin' The Coast, Inc. v. Blessons, LLC
as 1:2016cv00356
Plaintiff:
Cruisin' The Coast, Inc.
Defendant:
Blessons, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
