Mississippi Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 200
Cox v. Morris et al
as 3:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
James B. Cox
Defendant:
James Morris, James Noland and Brandon Hackett
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Healthone, Inc. et al v. Forrest General Hospital
as 3:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Healthone, Inc. and Burns McFarland
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Madden Home Design, LLC v. Oxford Commons I, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Oxford Commons I, LLC and David Blackburn
Plaintiff:
Madden Home Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Sartin et al
as 3:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Mitzi Sartin and John Does Numbers 1 through 99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Live Face on Web, LLC v. Natchez Board of Realtors, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Live Face on Web, LLC
Defendant:
Natchez Board of Realtors, Inc. and Joe W. Stedman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Live Face on Web, LLC v. Daryl Lofton Agency, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Live Face on Web, LLC
Defendant:
Daryl Lofton Agency, LLC and Daryl W. Lofton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Zuffa, LLC v. Shurden et al
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
John M. Shurden, Angela R. Shurden and Gemini Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Wells
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
John W. Wells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Warnock Engineering, LLC et al v. Canton Municipal Utilities
as 3:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Warnock Engineering, LLC and Rudolph M. Warnock, Jr.
Defendant:
Canton Municipal Utilities
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Cox et al
as 1:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
James B. Cox, Catherine A. Cox, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
