Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 11,955
Breazeale v. DCF et al
as 4:2019cv00111
Plaintiff: Marty Christopher Breazeale
Defendant: Parchman Prison, DCF
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Mason
as 3:2019cv00534
Plaintiff: Nakia Lewis
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Mason
as 3:2019cv00535
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Victor Mason
Plaintiff: Virgil Robinson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fluker v. Prince et al
as 3:2019cv00525
Defendant: Patricia Prince
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: LaQuon A. Fluker
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Elwell et al
as 3:2019cv00526
Defendant: Sgt Brian Elwell, Officer Timothy Fisackerly
Plaintiff: Jarret Montez Wilson
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00524
Plaintiff: Russell Carr
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carr v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00523
Plaintiff: Russell Carr
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Arrington
as 5:2019cv00066
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Petitioner: Victor Dewayne Jones
Respondent: Unknown Arrington
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silas v. Franklin et al
as 3:2019cv00515
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Lt. Franklin, Joann Shivers, M.D.O.C.
Plaintiff: Brandon R. Silas
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Haro v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00514
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden David Paul
Plaintiff: Javier Haro
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?