US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,308
Lett v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00273
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kellie Marie Lett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Caldwell v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01848
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Paula Y. Caldwell
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barton v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01787
Plaintiff:
Travis Barton
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Forester v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01783
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Forester
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prenger v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01766
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Prenger
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prenger v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Prenger
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Donaldson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00077
Plaintiff:
Nicole S Donaldson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Chambers v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00073
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Eugene Chambers and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Eoff v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nancy Eoff
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Davault v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Davault
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.