US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,711
Flenoid v. USA
as 4:2023cv00264
Petitioner:
Larry Flenoid
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00230
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Harris v Blitz et al
as 4:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Harris
Defendant:
Robert D. Blitz and Kelly Farrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre v. USA
as 4:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Bobby Andre
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Stange et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Andre Davis
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonya Young and Nina Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair et al v. Boyer et al
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Diamond-Donnell D. Blair and William C. Blair
Defendant:
Brian Boyer, Anne Precythe, Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Morris
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Annesser et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Heather Annesser, Rosanna Williams, Molly Leija and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Turner et al
as 4:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Morrow
Defendant:
Heather Turner, Timothy McFarland, Stephen Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
