US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 1,599
Hanifl et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00527
Plaintiff:
William Hanifl and Julie Hanifl
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorgan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00529
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Madenna K. Dorgan and Richard Dorgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv06099
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Keith Foster and Kimberly Fromm Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dittmer v. Jason Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00525
Defendant:
Forney Industries, Inc. and Jason Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kenton Dittmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frost v. Logan's Roadhouse, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv03188
Plaintiff:
Julie Frost
Defendant:
Logan's Roadhouse, Inc. and Ippolito International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waddle v. Calibrated Products et al
as 4:2020cv00481
Defendant:
Altec Industries, Inc., Calibrated Products and Summit Truck Group of Missouri, LLC
Plaintiff:
Wesley Waddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilstrap v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv03160
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gilstrap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellebracht v. Walmart Inc.
as 4:2020cv00361
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shelby Ellebracht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cotter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv03093
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Vernon Cotter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benanti v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv03097
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Frank Benanti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
