Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 8,500
Harris v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv01705
Plaintiff:
Laura Elizabeth Harris
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv00933
Plaintiff:
AJ Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Austin v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03390
Plaintiff:
Eric David Austin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Post v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
Rachael Michelle Post
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hunt v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Kelli Lin Hunt
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cook v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05106
Plaintiff:
Ralph Edward Cook
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chrysler v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv05107
Plaintiff:
Amber Lynn Chrysler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grable v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv06163
Plaintiff:
Dayan Lee Grable
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Budd v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03383
Plaintiff:
Evan J. Budd
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDonald v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Steven McDonald
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
