US District Court for the District of Montana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,812
Smith v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2021cv00070
Petitioner:
Jacob Smith
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McHugh v. Missoula County Detention Facility Staff and Representatives
as 9:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Zackary L. McHugh
Defendant:
Missoula County Detention Facility Staff and Representatives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bird v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2021cv00103
Petitioner:
Clifford Bird, Sr.
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen, Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lout v. State of Montana
as 9:2021cv00102
Petitioner:
Jeffery John Lout
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammonds v. Medical Rep. Chase et al
as 1:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Hammonds
Defendant:
Medical Rep. Chase, Medical Rep. Lovato, Sgt. Riley
and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levi Hill
Defendant:
State of Montana, Gallatin County Jail
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. State of Montana
as 6:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Boyd
Defendant:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maestas v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2021cv00065
Petitioner:
Jeremy L. Maestas
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen, Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horner v. USA
as 4:2021cv00096
Petitioner:
Ronald Ray Horner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Blackcrow et al v. Lake County Montana et al
as 9:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Aloysius D. Blackcrow, Tyler F. Erickson, James R. Elverud
and others
Defendant:
Lake County Montana, Paul Briney, William Barron
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
