U.S. District Court for the District of Montana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,718
Kirn v. Godfrey et al
as 2:2025cv00059
Petitioner:
Clayton Douglas Kirn
Respondent:
Demetric Godfrey and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Hurd et al
as 6:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
John O. Miller
Defendant:
Steve Hurd, Bradley Newman, Jimmy Patelis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Department of Interior et al
as 4:2025cv00045
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Interior, Ken Paxton and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Shea et al
as 2:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jones
Defendant:
Ann M. Shea and Eillen Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis

as 4:2025cv00044
Petitioner:
Skychief Chiefstick Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In Re Ogburn
as 4:2025cv00043
Plaintiff:
John Meade Ogburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Godfrey

as 9:2025cv00076
Petitioner:
Tracey Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prince v. Silver Bow County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Prince
Defendant:
Silver Bow County Detention Facility, Justine Hardy, Detention Officer Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Trinity Services Group et al
as 4:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
Ned Bryant Gardner
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Crossroads Correctional Facility, Markie Furr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miesmer v. Jovanovich et al
as 9:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
Branden Miesmer
Defendant:
Sam Jovanovich, Jim Salmonsen, Beau Baltezar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.