US District Court for the District of Nebraska Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,189
Hall v. Burlington Northern RailRoad et al
as 8:2024cv00266
Defendant:
Cass County Nebraska and Burlington Northern RailRoad
Plaintiff:
Rex Norman Hall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Kuehner v. Marion et al
as 8:2024cv00262
Defendant:
Shaina N. Marion and Mitchell J. Krutina
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Kuehner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holloway v. Placzek
as 8:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Walter Holloway
Defendant:
Matthew Placzek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hood-Bey v. Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 8:2024cv00255
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Jessica Walker, Officer Noah Zendejas (2513) and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Hood-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Filyaw v. Corsi et al
as 4:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
Gillian Filyaw
Defendant:
Matt Ahern and Steve Corsi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.