District of Nebraska Court Cases

Cases filed

Cases 11 - 20 of 9,338
Tyler v. State of Nebraska We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv00173
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent: State of Nebraska
Petitioner: Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrington v. Hall County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2015cv03052
Defendant: Scott Arnold, Band of Men, Keith Baumfalk and others
Plaintiff: Shane Harrington
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Brooks v. Nebraska Dept. of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv03051
Petitioner: Clinton Brooks, Jr.
Respondent: Scott Frakes, Nebraska Dept. of Corrections
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
S & B Lincoln Apartments I, LLC v. SGN+A, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00170
Plaintiff: S & B Lincoln Apartments I, LLC
Defendant: SGN+A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Tie Yard of Omaha, Inc. v. Calhoun and Company
as 8:2015cv00169
Defendant: Calhoun and Company
Plaintiff: The Tie Yard of Omaha, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Dispute
First National Bank of Omaha v. Gleason
as 8:2015mc00052
Plaintiff: First National Bank of Omaha
Defendant: Thomas Alan Gleason
Interested Party: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00168
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Cooley v. USA
as 4:2015cv03050
Petitioner: Richard E. Cooley
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In Re: Cameron Chrisp
as 8:2015cv00167
In Re: Cameron Chrisp
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00165
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Sex)
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.