US District Court for the District of New Hampshire Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,729
New Hampshire Youth Movement v. David
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
New Hampshire Youth Movement
Defendant:
David M. Scanlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Scaer et al v. Nashua, NH, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Defendant:
Risk Manager, City of Nashua, NH, Mayor, City of Nashua, NH and Nashua, NH, City of
Plaintiff:
Stephen Scaer and Bethany R. Scaer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bedard v. USA
as 1:2024cv00254
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Gary-Alan Bedard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Supervisor Court Clerk, City Court, Syracuse, NY
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Supervisor Court Clerk, City Court, Syracuse, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reckendorf v. Kensington, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2024cv00260
Defendant:
Kensington, NH, Town of and Brad Von Haden
Plaintiff:
Derek Reckendorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hotarek v. Motel North Conway, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert Hotarek
Defendant:
Motel North Conway, Inc. doing business as Comfort Inn & Suites
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
