US District Court for the District of New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,817
KHAN
as 2:2024cv09072
Petitioner:
ERIK KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HENDERSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2024cv09034
Petitioner:
MARCUS HENDERSON
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON and FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TINOCO ARAUZ v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv08994
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN TINOCO ARAUZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FERNANDEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv09014
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
JUAN RAMON FERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERRY v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 3:2024cv08967
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Petitioner:
TYRONE T PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv08949
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON and FCI FORT DIX
Petitioner:
MARSHALL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MURILLO-CABEZAS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv08820
Petitioner:
LUIS FERNANDO MURILLO-CABEZAS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STATHUM v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 3:2024cv08843
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
TODD STATHUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REDDEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al.
as 3:2024cv08847
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner:
RICHARD REDDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. JOHNSON
as 2:2024cv08812
Respondent:
MARQUIS JOHNSON
Petitioner:
SHAQUILLE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
