US District Court for the District of New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 6,705
DIAZ-VELEZ v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22768
Petitioner:
LUIS DIAZ-VELEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TOUT-PUISSANT v. R. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22732
Petitioner:
JASON TOUT-PUISSANT
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DOUGHERTY v. WYSOL et al
as 1:2023cv22744
Petitioner:
KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
GEORGE WYSOL, JUDGE DIAMOND, JUDGE WOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEMRIC, JR., v. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22634
Petitioner:
ALFRED P. HEMRIC, JR.,
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BULGER v. WARREN COUNTY
as 3:2023cv22639
Petitioner:
DANNY BULGER
Respondent:
WARREN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ZAMUDIO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv22602
Petitioner:
REYNALDO PEREZ ZAMUDIO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VAZQUEZ v. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22368
Petitioner:
JAIME VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MERCEDES-VALDEZ v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22398
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MERCEDES-VALDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TORRES v. CHETIRKIN
as 3:2023cv22350
Petitioner:
ANGEL T. TORRES and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOSS v. PITTMAN et al
as 2:2023cv22351
Petitioner:
HORATIO JOSS
Respondent:
YOLANDA PITTMAN, JOHN TSOUKARIS and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
