US District Court for the District of New Jersey Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,385
GIL v. TWO APRONS, LLC
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
RODRIGO GIL
Defendant:
TWO APRONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CRIOLLO v. THREE ACES TRANSPORTATION INC
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
HENDRY CRIOLLO
Defendant:
THREE ACES TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RIVAS v. NATURE'S APPRENTICE, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
NIXON RIVERA RIVAS
Defendant:
NATURE'S APPRENTICE, LLC and ZAC TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MCINTOSH et al v. INQUISITHEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
SHARI MCINTOSH, KELLIE WALKER, TIFFANY DELOATCH and others
Defendant:
INQUISITHEALTH, INC., PYX HEALTH, INC. and Dr. ASHWIN PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HERNANDEZ v. CMC TRUCK SERVICE, INC., et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CMC TRUCK SERVICE, INC., and CHRISTOPHER CIARDIELLO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FERNANDEZ et al v. MLM CONSTRUCTION INC
as 2:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO FERNANDEZ and CRISTOPHER FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
MLM CONSTRUCTION INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TORRES v. SALMA INC
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
OSCAR TORRES
Defendant:
SALMA INC and BOB AKA BOVABID ELAROUSSI ROSSI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PAEZ v. C&D LIQUOR, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
RENE PAEZ
Defendant:
C&D LIQUOR, INC. and SAM FATEO
TORRES v. SALMA INC et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Defendant:
BOB ROSSI, SALMA INC and BOVABID ELAROUSSI
Plaintiff:
OSCAR TORRES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NAVARRO v. NECSOSA LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant:
NECSOSA LLC and DAVID DE LA CRUZ MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
