US District Court for the District of New Jersey Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 514
KOHRHERR v. CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC
as 1:2022cv02208
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS KOHRHERR
Defendant:
CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
ROBB
as 1:2022cv02212
Plaintiff:
EUGENIA ROBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
ROBB v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC et al.
as 3:2022cv02214
Plaintiff:
EUGENIA ROBB
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
CASTILLERO v. XTEND HEALTHCARE, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02099
Plaintiff:
SHEILA CASTILLERO
Defendant:
XTEND HEALTHCARE, LLC and STAFF MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HENRY, et al., v. MARKS, et al.,
as 1:2022cv02101
Defendant:
MARKSMEN LANDSCAPING, LLC, ANTHONY MARKS, FRANK MARKS and others
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE HENRY, MAURICE GERALDS, KEVIN MERRITT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
ELLIS et al v. PEPSICO, INC.
as 3:2022cv01895
Plaintiff:
TRACY ELLIS
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ELLIS et al v. PEPSICO, INC.
as 2:2022cv01895
Plaintiff:
TRACY ELLIS
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WALSH v. CORDOBA GANDARA et al
as 3:2022cv01862
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor MARTIN J. WALSH
Respondent:
BENJAMIN CORDOBA GANDARA and ELTON NASCMENTO DA SILVA
WALSH v. CORDOBA GANDARA et al
as 2:2022cv01862
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor MARTIN J. WALSH
Respondent:
BENJAMIN CORDOBA GANDARA and ELTON NASCMENTO DA SILVA
LAFALCE v. ENTITY EDWORK, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01763
Plaintiff:
AMANDA LAFALCE
Defendant:
ENTITY EDWORK, INC., JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES 1-20, ANGELICA PRONTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
