US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Cases 41 - 50 of 232,340
DOMINGUEZ v. NOVO NORDISK, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
ROXANN DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC., DOUG LANGA, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv11013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOWARTH v. ALL AROUND HANDYMAN SERVICES II LLC
as 3:2024cv11015
Defendant:
ALL AROUND HANDYMAN SERVICES II LLC doing business as ALL AROUND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Plaintiff:
MORGAN HOWARTH
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
EVENUS PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. et al v. PACIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv11014
Defendant:
Pacira BioSciences, Inc. and PACIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
JIANGSU HENGRUI PHARMACEUTICALS CO., LTD. and EVENUS PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HOWARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv11019
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
MARTHA H. HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
