New Jersey Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,314
KNUDSEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
MALINDA KNUDSEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MINUS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
DELAINE MINUS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
DAREN O. JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JAMES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
ANDREW S JAMES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
RICHARDSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
MARIE D RICHARDSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
MULLARKEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
TERESA A MULLARKEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FERNANDEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SAGAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
BRYAN S. SAGAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VARELA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
JUAN A. VARELA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
OSMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD OSMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
