New Jersey Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,283
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CRAFFY
as 3:2023cv03639
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Defendant:
CAZ L. CRAFFY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
HENRY v. FUTU HOLDINGS LIMITED et al
as 2:2023cv03222
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HENRY
Defendant:
FUTU HOLDINGS LIMITED, LEAF HUA LI and ARTHUR YU CHEN
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MINTZ et al
as 2:2023cv03201
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
HAL D. MINTZ and SABBY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
RIGO FERNANDEZ v. DOUYU INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED et al
as 2:2023cv03161
Plaintiff:
DAVID RIGO FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DOUYU INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, SHAOJIE CHEN and MINGMING SU
ARBOUR v. TINGO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ARBOUR
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DOZY MMOBUOSI, DARREN MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BLOEDORN v. TINGO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03153
Plaintiff:
MARK J. BLOEDORN
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP INC., DARREN MERCER, DOZY MMOBUOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
AMICARELLI v. FIRST HORIZON CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
ANDREW AMICARELLI and THE WATER ISLAND FUNDS
Defendant:
FIRST HORIZON CORPORATION, D. BRYAN JORDAN, HOPE DMUCHOWSKI and others
THE ARBITRAGE FUND v. THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Plaintiff:
THE ARBITRAGE FUND
Defendant:
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, BHARAT B. MASRANI, KELVIN VI LUAN TRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
PERDUE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
LARRY PERDUE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, ALAN H. SHAW, JAMES A. SQUIRES and others
CELANO v. FULCRUM THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02360
Plaintiff:
GERALD CELANO
Defendant:
FULCRUM THERAPEUTICS, INC., BRYAN STUART, ROBERT J. GOULD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
