U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,289
Artis v. Second Judicial District Court
as 1:2025cv00365
Petitioner:
Stewart M. Artis
Respondent:
Second Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Warren v. Chief Commissioner et al
as 1:2025cv00360
Petitioner:
Charles Warren
Respondent:
Chief Commissioner and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lopez v. LNU
as 1:2025cv00344
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lopez
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash, Jr. v. Clovis Police Department et al
as 2:2025cv00342
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Clovis Police Department and Jacqueline Granillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of New Mexico
as 1:2025cv00339
Petitioner:
Cristyn Jeanette Smith
Respondent:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Torres v. Whitten et al
as 1:2025cv00325
Petitioner:
Alexias Torres
Respondent:
Rick Whitten and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teel v. LNU
as 2:2025cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Teel
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Riker's Island GRVC
as 1:2025cv00301
Plaintiff:
Gesner Jones
Defendant:
Riker's Island GRVC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Da-Quan v. LNU
as 1:2025cv00293
Plaintiff:
Charles Da-Quan Warren
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
