U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,310
Flores v. Sugg et al
as 1:2025cv00242
Petitioner:
Walter M. Flores
Respondent:
John P. Sugg and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johns v. USA
as 1:2025cv00243
Petitioner:
Richard Johns
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Meza-Rocha v. Cole
as 2:2025cv00241
Petitioner:
Onesimo Meza-Rocha
Respondent:
David Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benavidez v. White et al
as 1:2025cv00234
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Benavidez
Defendant:
FNU White, FNU Salazar and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. White et al
as 1:2025cv00238
Plaintiff:
Robert Barrett
Defendant:
FNU White, FNU Salazar and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosgray v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2025cv00227
Petitioner:
David W. Cosgray
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OPENED IN ERROR
as 2:2025cv00229
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Defendant:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Martinez v. State Police
as 1:2025cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martinez
Defendant:
State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parra Munoz v. State of New Mexico
as 1:2025cv00215
Petitioner:
Adan Jose Parra Munoz
Respondent:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
