US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 496
United States of America v. Singh
as 2:2024cv02667
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5221 Foreign Bank Account Penalties
United States of America v. Any and All Shares of 21 East 61st Street Apartment Corp held in the Name of Lovitas, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02147
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Any and All Shares of 21 East 61st Street Apartment Corp held in the Name of Lovitas, Inc, Together with the appurtenant proprietary lease for cooperative Unit 12E Within the Real Property and Premise and Condominium Unit 58D, Together with It's Respective Appurtenances, Improvements, Fixtures Attachments, Easements and Furnishings, Located at 230 West 56TH Street, NY, NY 10019
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately Five Hundred Forty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars and Zero Cents ($541,953.00) Seized from JP Morgan Chase Na Account Number 928805297 Held In The Name of Jiawig Trade Inc.
as 1:2023cv09585
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: APPROXIMATELY FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($541,953.00) SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE NA ACCOUNT NUMBER 928805297 HELD IN THE NAME OF JIAWIG TRAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
APPROXIMATELY FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($541,953.00) SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE NA ACCOUNT NUMBER 928805297 HELD IN THE NAME OF JIAWIG TRAD
as 1:2023cv09583
Plaintiff: APPROXIMATELY FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($541,953.00) SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE NA ACCOUNT NUMBER 928805297 HELD IN THE NAME OF JIAWIG TRAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Veeraswamy
as 1:2023cv09379
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Karen Veeraswamy
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5221 Foreign Bank Account Penalties
United States of America v. Larcher-Muhr
as 2:2023cv07476
Defendant: Thi Larcher-Muhr and Thi Hong Bui
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5221 Foreign Bank Account Penalties
United States of America v. Larcher-Muhr
as 1:2023cv07476
Defendant: Thi Larcher-Muhr and Thi Hong Bui
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5221 Foreign Bank Account Penalties
United States of America v. Bhasin et al
as 2:2023cv01470
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Harjeet Bhasin, Gurcharan S Bhasin and Gurcharan S. Bhasin
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5221 Foreign Bank Account Penalties
United States of America v. The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07410
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto, The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 203, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto, Any And All Funds On Deposit In Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Account Number Ending In 9142, Held In The Name Of 7D Business Bureau Inc., And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto and others
Claimant: 73DT Business Enterprises, LLC, 7D Business Bureau, Inc. and Yosef Manela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv06725
Plaintiff: United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice and CAPRICORN GOODS WHOLESALERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?