US District Court for the Northern District of New York Social Security Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 5,966
Kesler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Kesler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thibault v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Thibault
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Melocka D. Robinson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Milton Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zeilnhofer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Edward Lloyd Zeilnhofer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ava L. Riley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gatewood v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Tamela L. Gatewood
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Head v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Valarie J Head
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Boulter v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Boulter
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pratt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
