US District Court for the Northern District of New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,933
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dan v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01233
Defendant:
John Vandenburgh, Peter J. Kusminsky, Shaun S. Groden and others
Plaintiff:
Chong Lee Dan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Noonan
as 3:2024cv01235
Defendant:
Judge Brett S. Noonan
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 1:2024cv01229
Defendant:
Glen Helen Rehabilitation Center, Charles Leeb, Melissa Ann Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Peterson et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Defendant:
UW Credit Union and James D. Peterson
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 7701 Federal CAN-Spam Act
Hotaling v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv01216
Defendant:
Kelly Ahern and Daniel Martuscello
Plaintiff:
Robert Hotaling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Shook v. NYS Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment et al
as 1:2024cv01218
Defendant:
Emilie Miller, Brandon Behan, Lisa Testa and others
Plaintiff:
Delores Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
