US District Court for the Northern District of New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,902
Zbytniewski, III v. Hochul et al
as 6:2021cv01045
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Zbytniewski, III
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Howard Zucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mannarino v. The County of Schenectady et al
as 1:2021cv01042
Plaintiff:
John Mannarino
Defendant:
The County of Schenectady, Dominic A. D'Agostino, Eugene Sellie
and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv01037
Plaintiff:
Chloe Barr
Defendant:
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson, Dr. Lee McElroy, Dr. Leslie Lawrence
and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L.T. et al v. Zucker
as 1:2021cv01034
Plaintiff:
L.T., M.T., Jeffrey N. Thomas
and others
Defendant:
Howard A. Zucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggsware v. United States Secret Service et al
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eggsware
Defendant:
United States Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Albany Police Department
and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New Hope Family Services, Inc. v. James et al
as 5:2021cv01031
Plaintiff:
New Hope Family Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Letitia James, Licha Nyiendo, Melissa Franco
and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. James et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant:
Leticia James, Stacy D. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wang v. Bethlehem Central School District et al
as 1:2021cv01023
Plaintiff:
Juneau Wang
Defendant:
Bethlehem Central School District, Jody Monroe
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Maher et al
as 5:2021cv01018
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown
Defendant:
Brian P Maher, John Snyder, Margaret Montfort-Balfour
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Dr. A et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2021cv01009
Plaintiff:
Dr. A, Nurse A., Dr. C.
and others
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
