US District Court for the Western District of New York Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brent v. Joseph Sage Auto Sales, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv06826
Plaintiff:
Cleo Brent
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation and Joseph Sage Auto Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Carmichael v. Windham Professionals et al
as 1:2016cv00833
Plaintiff:
Gina Diane Carmichael
Defendant:
Windham Professionals and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Main Stream Motors, LLC
as 6:2015cv06556
Plaintiff:
Shalondra Wade
Defendant:
Main Stream Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Grimmer v. Superior Auto Sales Inc.
as 1:2015cv00765
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Grimmer
Defendant:
Superior Auto Sales Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Tomczak v. Raymour and Flanigan Furniture Company et al
as 1:2013cv00709
Defendant:
Raymour and Flanigan Furniture Company and Raymour and Flanigan Furniture, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Tomczak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Barnes v. Rochester Residential Remodeling LLC et al
as 6:2010cv06460
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Barnes
Defendant:
Rochester Residential Remodeling LLC, James Verweire and AmeriFirst Home Improvement Finance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Ahrens et al v. Mortgage Line Financial Corp. et al
as 6:2009cv06512
Plaintiff:
Rex E. Ahrens and Jane A. Ahrens
Defendant:
Mortgage Line Financial Corp., First National Bank of Arizona and General Motors Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Dumanis v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. et al
as 6:2007cv06070
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Dumanis
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Obot v. Citibank South Dakota, N.A.
as 1:2004cv00784
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
