New York Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,003
Shetterly v. Bienstock et al
as 1:2024cv04155
Defendant:
DocGo Inc., Lee Bienstock, Andre Oberholzer and others
Plaintiff:
Ryne Shetterly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Whitfield v. Buechler et al
as 1:2024cv03176
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Kenneth F. Buechler, Ph.D., Evelyn S. Dilsaver, Edward L. Michael and others
Polished.com, Inc. v. Fouerti
as 1:2024cv02658
Plaintiff:
Polished.com, Inc., f/k/a 1847 Goedeker Inc. and Polished.com, Inc.,
Defendant:
Albert Fouerti
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Pioneer Capital Anstalt v. Super League Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02524
Defendant:
Super League Enterprises, Inc. and Super League Gaming, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pioneer Capital Anstalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Trillium Partners, L.P. v. R4 Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02259
Plaintiff:
Trillium Partners, L.P.
Defendant:
R4 Technologies Inc., Peter Belton, Paul Breitenbach and others
Hirani v. Lando et al
as 1:2024cv01948
Defendant:
Zvi Lando, Ronen Faier, Nadav Zafrir and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hirani
Abbey v. Aldag et al
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Kyle Abbey
Defendant:
Edward, Jr. K. Aldag, J. Kevin Hanna, R. Steven Hamner and others
Karp v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Karp and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, John J. Pinto, Alessandro P. Dinello and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Pierce v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Aaron Pierce and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Wang v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
