New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 14,915
Palmer v. McIntosh
as 1:2023cv09863
Petitioner:
Russell D. Palmer
Respondent:
D. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaDuke v. Miller
as 9:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
Robert LaDuke
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro-Almonte v. Searls
as 1:2023cv01160
Petitioner:
Luis D. Castro-Almonte
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luevaro v. Texas State Bar et al
as 9:2023cv01376
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevaro
Respondent:
Texas State Bar and Texas Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fall v. Kopp
as 1:2023cv09683
Petitioner:
Cheichk Fall
Respondent:
M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullings v. Finley
as 1:2023cv09603
Petitioner:
Kyle Mullings and Kyle T. Mullings
Respondent:
Scott Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenkins v. Lilley
as 1:2023cv09613
Petitioner:
Terrell Jenkins
Respondent:
Superintendent Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burns v. Clinton
as 1:2023cv09621
Petitioner:
Trevor Burns
Respondent:
Joe Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanderhorst v. Titus
as 9:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Jah-Lah Vanderhorst
Respondent:
Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tene v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2023cv09533
Petitioner:
Sonnia Tene
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
