New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 20,120
Edo v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Enekan Edo
Defendant:
Officer Danial Ryan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Culbreth v. Manuel et al
as 1:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
Kareem H. Culbreth
Defendant:
Manuel and Sgt. Brahm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Lafvorne Barnett
Defendant:
State of New York, John Dow, J. Wollcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Green
as 9:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Kanares Deans
Defendant:
C.O. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Department of Corrections Transit Bus 441B et al
as 1:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Transit Bus 441B, C.O. Endeaver, EMTC Intake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Auburn Correctional Facility Package Room
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Ashonta Z. Parker
Defendant:
Auburn Correctional Facility Package Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salley v. 114th Precinct
as 1:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Charles Vernon Salley
Defendant:
114th Precinct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundscho v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv06160
Plaintiff:
Nathan R. Bundscho
Defendant:
Chief Green and William Whalden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway v. The State of Connecticut Department of Correction
as 1:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Mr. Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
The State of Connecticut Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desir v. New York State DOCCS
as 9:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Stivenson Desir
Defendant:
New York State DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
