US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 295
Variety Stores, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00217
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Variety Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Ford's Foods Inc. v. Porky's Gourmet Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Ford's Foods Inc.
Defendant:
Porky's Gourmet Inc. and Ronald Boyle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. v. Pure Medical Spa, PLLC et al
as 5:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc.
Defendant:
Pure Medical Spa, PLLC , Briggs E. Cook, Jr. , Holly Donielle Wybel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
American Dairy Queen Corporation v. YS&J Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
American Dairy Queen Corporation
Defendant:
YS&J Enterprises, Inc. and John A. Ribet, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Haru Holding Corp. v. New City, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Haru Holding Corp.
Defendant:
New City, Inc., Smoothcom, Inc. , Haru Sushi, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
East Coast Hot Tubs, Inc. v. Ritchie, et al
as 2:2014cv00010
Defendant:
Thomas Ritchie and Natalie Ritchie
Plaintiff:
East Coast Hot Tubs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Warren Oil Company, Inc. v. Smitty's Supply, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Warren Oil Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Smitty's Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Dolor Technologies, LLC v. Surgpro, LLC
as 5:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dolor Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Surgpro, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Agri-Supply Company v. Gordon
as 5:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Agri-Supply Company
Defendant:
William Elvin Gordon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Coach, Inc., et al v. Brands for Less, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Brands for Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.