US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Torts - Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 122
Victoria Fire and Casualty Company v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Victoria Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lee v. Amend
as 4:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
Traven Marquet Lee
Defendant:
Scott Amend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Ansteth et al v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00063
Defendant:
Sea Ray Boats, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Ansteth and Joan Jesen Ansteth
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zep Inc. v. Midwest Motor Supply Co. et al
as 5:2008cv00629
Plaintiff:
Zep Inc.
Defendant:
Midwest Motor Supply Co. and John Kupec
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jeffries v. Chavis
as 5:2008cv00519
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M. Jeffries
Defendant:
William Chavis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thee Dollhouse Productions NC, Inc. et al v. Fairchild et al
as 5:2008cv00282
Plaintiff:
Thee Dollhouse Productions NC, Inc. and Michael Joseph Peter
Defendant:
VCG Holding Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. et al
as 7:2008cv00024
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Shawn Christopher Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Coleman v. United States Of America
as 5:2007cv00402
Plaintiff:
Rasheeba Coleman
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dillahunt et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
Norris Dillahunt and William Dove
Defendant:
Johnnie Clark and The City of New Bern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. v Marcus
as 5:2006cv00519
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
