US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 37,488
Divine Hospitality, LLC v. Owners Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Divine Hospitality, LLC
Defendant:
Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Hewett v. Coverance Insurance Solutions, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jason Hewett
Defendant:
COVERANCE INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
HEWETT v. TRUECOVERAGE LLC
as 7:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
JASON HEWETT
Defendant:
TRUECOVERAGE LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hollingsworth v. USA
as 5:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
Chip Anthony Hollingsworth
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Treece v. Truitt et al
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Catherine Truitt, Andrew Houlihan, Terry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Treece v. Hucks
as 5:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Erin Hucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Treece v. Kinsley et al
as 5:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Kody Kinsley and Vaughn S. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
B.G.H. et al v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
B.G.H., Natori T Harrell and Ryan Harrell
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Roberts v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02078
Petitioner:
Joseph Orlando Roberts
Respondent:
Katrina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
