US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 40
GRIFFIN v. ORANGE COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00794
Defendant:
JEFFREY E. THOMPSON, BONNIE B. HAMMERSLEY, ORANGE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
WOLFE v. HANESBRANDS, INC.
as 1:2020cv00660
Defendant:
HANESBRANDS, INC.
Plaintiff:
GRAY WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
NANCE v. PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00625
Defendant:
MELISSA CRAFTCHICK and PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH A. NANCE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
STUBBS v. CITY OF GREENSBORO
as 1:2020cv00311
Plaintiff:
Deric Stubbs
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
FRINK v. FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00113
Plaintiff:
TRACIE FRINK
Defendant:
FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MILLER v. WALMART INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00271
Defendant:
SARA WRIGHT, WALMART INC. and JIMMY TOWNSEND
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARRISON v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 1:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICOL GARRISON
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DAVIS v. WINSTON-SALEM STAE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2019cv00231
Plaintiff:
THABITI DAVIS
Defendant:
WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY and THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
WILLIAMS V. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2018cv00831
Defendant:
DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff:
BETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
PRIDDY v. MOSES CONE MEDICAL SERVICES INC, et al
as 1:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
TONDRA PRIDDY
Defendant:
MOSES CONE MEDICAL SERVICES , THE MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , CONE HEALTH CONNECTED CARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
