US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,358
Ayers v. Crisp
as 5:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
William J. Ayers
Respondent:
Joshua Crisp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ayers v. Crisp
as 5:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
William J. Ayers
Respondent:
Joshua Crisp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Azar El v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00372
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El
Respondent:
Jaxson Hale and Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mabe v. LNU et al
as 1:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Michael Mabe
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU LNU 2, Misty Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Ishee et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Darius Bowens
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Eddie Buffaloe, Mike Slagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2022cv00364
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Bender
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Garry L. McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luckey v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Luckey
Defendant:
Glen Jenkins, T.J. Goforth, City of Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00355
Petitioner:
Edward Junior Patterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mobley v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Damon Mandell Mobley
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department, Caleb Edwards and Polk County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Brown
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dasha Clark Norman
Defendant:
Wayn Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
