North Carolina Real Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 118
JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. WOMBLE
as 1:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
GEORGE WOMBLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States Of America v. 11.51 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Wayne County, State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2007cv00195
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
11.51 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Wayne County, State of North Carolina and Nan B. Montague
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condemnation
v. wackenhut
as 3:2007cv00104
Defendant:
wackenhut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States Of America v. 685.76 Acres of Land, more of less, in Bethel Township et al
as 2:2007cv00002
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
685.76 Acres of Land, more of less, in Bethel Township, Moorman Pine Plantations, L.L.C., Moorman Pine Plantations, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condemnation
Cowell et al v. Gaston County et al
as 3:2006cv00394
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2006cv00777
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Burke et al v. Elliott
as 2:2006cv00025
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
City of Wilson Redevelopment Commission v. Boykin et al
as 5:2006cv00275
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Actions - Property on which U.S. had lien
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PROPERTY, 1.374 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2005cv01143
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condemnation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
