North Carolina Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 437
The Boeing Company v. Ten Oaks Management, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
The Boeing Company
Defendant:
Ten Oaks Management, LLC, Andrew Lovrovich and David Richeson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
test v. Test -(Ignore Case Used for TEST in Implementing NextGen)
as 5:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
test test
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Octapharma Plasma, Inc. v. SeePoint, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
Defendant:
SeePoint, LLC, Jonathan Arfin and Sydney Arfin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rita's Angels 2nd Chance Animal Rescue & Sanctuary Inc. v. Petsense, LLC
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Rita's Angels 2nd Chance Animal Rescue & Sanctuary Inc.
Defendant:
Petsense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hubbard v. Harrison
as 3:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
William A. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Hixson v. Hixson et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Richard Hixson
Defendant:
Janet Pichon Hixson and Lynn Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RICCORDELLA et al v. FANDUEL GROUP
as 1:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MARK RICCORDELLA and MICHELLE RICCORDELLA
Defendant:
FANDUEL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WILSON v. SAMPSON
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILSON
Defendant:
ALESHA SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson et al v. Paparazzi, LLC
as 5:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Crystal Johnson, Karen Langston, Pamela Sheehan-Peterson and others
Defendant:
Paparazzi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clark v. Universal Adcom, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Clark
Defendant:
Universal Adcom, LLC, James Gildenblatt, Conner Gildenblatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
