District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 4,334
Watkins v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2015hc02111
Petitioner: Darius Lamont Watkins
Respondent: Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barajas-Barajas v. Rivers Prison
as 5:2015hc02110
Petitioner: Mario Barajas-Barajas
Respondent: Rivers Prison
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Midyette v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2015hc02108
Petitioner: Joseph D. Midyette
Respondent: United States of America, Terrence W. Boyle, Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Medina v. CI - Rivers Prison, NC
as 5:2015hc02109
Petitioner: Jaime Medina
Respondent: CI - Rivers Prison, NC
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meeks v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2015hc02106
Petitioner: John Morgan Meeks
Respondent: Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joyner v. Thornton
as 5:2015hc02107
Petitioner: Randall Lee Joyner
Respondent: Cynthia Thornton
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Mitchell
as 5:2015hc02105
Petitioner: Chad Lamont Williams
Respondent: David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbault v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2015hc02104
Petitioner: Roger Gilbault
Respondent: Kenny Atkinson, J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Patterson v. Western District of NC
as 1:2015cv00097
Petitioner: Juan Avery Patterson
Respondent: Western District of NC
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015hc02102
Petitioner: Justice Devon Price
Respondent: United States of America, Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.