North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 5,324
PARSONS v. CENTRAL PRISON
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
DANIELL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
CENTRAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03342
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Contreras
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
James v. NCDAC - Division of Prisons et al
as 5:2023ct03341
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Defendant:
NCDAC - Division of Prisons, Officer Gaskins, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2023ct03338
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and DAC of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Partin v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2023ct03339
Plaintiff:
Courtney Garvin Partin
Defendant:
Warden Scarantino, Dr. Cloutier, Dr. Sharf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BARNES v. GIBSON et al
as 1:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS BARNES
Defendant:
JAKAYLA Z. GIBSON, SEGARA, RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pippinger v. Buncombe County Government Employees et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Daniel Pippinger
Defendant:
Buncombe County Government Employees, FNU LNU, Central Medical Industries & Medidex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le Maitre v. Parlier et al
as 5:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Wendell Jude Le Maitre
Defendant:
D. Parlier and D. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobbs v. McMahon
as 5:2023ct03337
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMBERT v. MCNALLY et al
as 1:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
BRANSON LAMBERT
Defendant:
DR. MCNALLY, CENTHIA HAYWORTH, CODY RICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
