District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 93,301
Parks v. Dismukes
as 5:2025hc02116
Petitioner:
Jorindal Q. Parks
Respondent:
Leslie Dismukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Dismukes
as 5:2025hc02117
Petitioner:
Corey Walker
Respondent:
Leslie Dismukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Joyner
as 5:2025ct03115
Plaintiff:
Milton Jones
Defendant:
Officer Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Davis
as 4:2025cv00086
Plaintiff:
Edmond Luc Davis
Defendant:
Nikki Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Granite Re, Inc. v. Subsurface Irrigation, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv00334
Plaintiff:
Granite Re, Inc.
Defendant:
Subsurface Irrigation, Inc. doing business as Carolina Courtworks, Carolina Courtworks Inc. and Benjamin R. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PMC Marketing & Sales, Inc. v. Arrowhead Engineered Products, Inc.
as 5:2025cv00080
Plaintiff:
PMC Marketing & Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Arrowhead Engineered Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Walker v. Dismukes
as 3:2025cv00333
Petitioner:
Corey Walker
Respondent:
Leslie Dismukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00147
Plaintiff:
Tara Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ALLEY v. USA
as 1:2025cv00394
Petitioner:
CHADLEY DEAN ALLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAWKINS v. DISMUKES
as 1:2025cv00392
Petitioner:
ERIC DAWKINS
Respondent:
LESLIE DISMUKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
