District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 86,599
Love v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Love
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hampton v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Sally Hampton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Stevens v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Nellie Stevens
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Holliday v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Wanda Holliday
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Payne v. U.S. Army Material Command (AMC) et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Ssgt. Timothy Adam Payne
Defendant:
U.S. Army Material Command (AMC), Angelica J. Jennette, Joyce Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner:
Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent:
Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coble v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Coble
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Economic Improvement Council, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonner
Defendant:
Economic Improvement Council, Inc., Landon Mason Sr. and Vanessa Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.