District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 87,130
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Ingram
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Mary Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Woody v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jesse Willard Woody
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hodges v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Margaret Courtney Hodges
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Pearson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
James W. Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walker v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dowell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Michael Dowell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blizard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blizard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
