US District Court for the District of North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 288
Poitra v. North Dakota, State of
as 1:2013cv00096
Petitioner:
Joshua John Poitra
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. United States Marshal
as 3:2013cv00058
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peltier v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00088
Petitioner:
Stacy Lee Peltier
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunter v. United States Marshal
as 3:2013cv00052
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burke v. Schmalenberger
as 1:2013cv00073
Petitioner:
Dale Joseph Burke
Respondent:
Robyn Schmalenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salus v. North Dakota, State of
as 1:2013cv00058
Petitioner:
Andrew Harland Salus
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Stenehjem
as 3:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
Robert Doyal Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odom v. Braun
as 1:2013cv00035
Petitioner:
Charles Odom
Respondent:
Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeCoteau v. Schweitzer
as 3:2013cv00011
Petitioner:
Gerald Lee DeCoteau
Respondent:
Alex Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darby v. State of North Dakota
as 3:2013cv00009
Petitioner:
Vonnie Darin Darby
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
