North Dakota Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Ness v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael Ness
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gustafson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gustafson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Brockel v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Toby Brockle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carlson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Carlson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Trotter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brian Earl Trotter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stanfield v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Stanfield
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Coykendall v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Coykendall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ryan v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Corey James Ryan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bingham v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Abraham Bingham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Denton v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Paul Mathew Denton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
