North Dakota Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Falk v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv00351
Plaintiff: Gabriel J. Falk
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Erickson v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00030
Plaintiff: Thomas Luther Erickson
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Marsden v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2015cv00119
Plaintiff: Patrick C. Marsden
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Leadbetter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv00058
Plaintiff: Susan L. Leadbetter
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boelter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00070
Plaintiff: Edwin B. Boelter
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Quinn v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00013
Plaintiff: Dustin Roger Quinn
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fowler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00022
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sheila A. Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Skoog v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff: Nikki Rae Skoog
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nordin v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2012cv00015
Plaintiff: Mark H. Nordin
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Marchus v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00074
Plaintiff: Lisa J. Marchus
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?