North Dakota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Emrit v. Jules
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ree v. Belcourt School District et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Emerson Joe Ree
Defendant:
Belcourt School District, Michelle Thomas, Melvin Laducer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Blanchard v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Blanchard and Stanley Keith Blanchard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Smith v. Neo et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
Theresa Neo and St. Louis, County of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mehu v. WDAY et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Marlon Mozart Mehu
Defendant:
WDAY doing business as Forum Communications Company, Jeff Nelson, Drew Trafton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Banerjee v. Brady et al
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joyanta Banerjee
Defendant:
Reid A. Brady, East Central Judicial District and North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
