U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,329
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv00536
Petitioner:
Tashawn Dwight Armstrong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nichols v. United States of America
as 3:2025cv00529
Petitioner:
Roy Allen Nichols
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Townsend v. Spatney
as 1:2025cv00488
Petitioner:
Albert Townsend
Respondent:
Warden Jerry Spatney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carstaphen v. Luneke
as 1:2025cv00422
Petitioner:
Antonio Carstaphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fenderson v. Walters
as 3:2025cv00408
Petitioner:
Shakill Fenderson
Respondent:
Warden Ryan Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prince v. Untied States of America
as 5:2025cv00397
Petitioner:
Donte Prince
Respondent:
Untied States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cavender v. Healy
as 4:2025cv00364
Petitioner:
Walter R. Cavender
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whited v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2025cv00368
Petitioner:
Lawrence L. Whited
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vines v. Warden, FCI Fort Dix
as 4:2025cv00272
Petitioner:
Douglas Vines
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Chambers-Smith
as 1:2025cv00254
Petitioner:
Leonard Jenkins
Respondent:
Director Anette Chambers-Smith and Warden Malcolm Heard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
