U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Real Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,676
Pratt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03096
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Reuben Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sauseda v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03105
Plaintiff:
Michael Sauseda
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rodriguez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amirganian v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02922
Plaintiff:
Tina Amirganian
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Krohn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02997
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sheila Krohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Consuelo Lopez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Balciunas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02927
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Todd Balciunas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emeigh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02961
Plaintiff:
Perry Emeigh
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peart v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03024
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manley Peart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cribb v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02947
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Candice Cribb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.