District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 169,239
Fannie Mae v. Hatz One LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv01606
Defendant:
Hatz One LLC, Hatz Two LLC, BG Personnel LP and others
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bagley v. Community Minerals II, LLC
as 5:2024cv01603
Defendant:
Community Minerals II, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Bagley
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc. v. Simplified Living LLC
as 3:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc.
Defendant:
Simplified Living LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bassett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01600
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bassett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Mortimore v. loanDepot.com, LLC
as 3:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Michael Mortimore
Defendant:
loanDepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Byrd v. City of Forest Park et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Defendant:
City of Forest Park, Forest Park Police Department and Officers John Does 1-6
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyer v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv03956
Defendant:
Ross Co. CPS, Fairfield Co Sheriffs Office, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Alva R. Boyer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dukes v. Forshey
as 2:2024cv03957
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Petitioner:
Eddie Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
