District Court Cases in Ohio

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 153,045
Heilman v. Pandrol, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02132
Plaintiff: Daniel Heilman
Defendant: Pandrol, Inc. and Pandrol USA, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv02133
Plaintiff: Jason Lamont Anderson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Roldan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04166
Plaintiff: Paulina Roldan
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv04167
Plaintiff: Denise Adams
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kaufman v. Gardner Pie Company
as 5:2022cv02126
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Kaufman
Defendant: Gardner Pie Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carmona v. Grammer, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02127
Plaintiff: Lawrence Carmona
Defendant: Grammer, Inc. and Toledo Molding & Die, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
First Brands Group, LLC v. Neenah, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02128
Plaintiff: First Brands Group, LLC
Defendant: Neenah, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Critical Response Group v. LongbowATP, LLC
as 3:2022cv02129
Plaintiff: Critical Response Group
Defendant: LongbowATP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02131
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Picou v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04151
Plaintiff: Ashley Picou
Defendant: C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?