Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,921
Davis v. Warden, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 2:2024cv03925
Respondent:
Warden, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Alan Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCloud v. Warden Doug Luneke
as 1:2024cv01523
Petitioner:
Ronald McCloud
Respondent:
Warden Doug Luneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Stuff
as 5:2024cv01502
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Petitioner:
Stanley Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teagarden v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03896
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Trevor Teagarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Teagarden
as 2:2024cv03898
Petitioner:
Trevor Teagarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Teagarden v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03899
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Trevor Teagarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teagarden v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2024oe03896
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Trevor Teagarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Teagarden
as 2:2024oe03898
Petitioner:
Trevor Teagarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Miller v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv01461
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Petitioner:
Leelin J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00449
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
Matthew E. Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
