Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,941
Denson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv03835
Petitioner:
David Lee Denson
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00434
Petitioner:
David Lee Denson
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lundy v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2024cv03806
Petitioner:
Markale Ian Lundy
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Workman v. Okereke
as 3:2024cv01300
Petitioner:
Timothy Scott Workman
Respondent:
Warden Jossette Okereke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rones v. Rowlands
as 5:2024cv01301
Defendant:
Judge Margaret Rowlands
Plaintiff:
Murry Allen Rones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lundy v. Davis
as 5:2024cv01305
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia Davis
Petitioner:
Markale Ian Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Fender
as 4:2024cv01288
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCloud v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00398
Petitioner:
Ronald McCloud
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Shelby Smith, Warden of Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03771
Defendant:
Shelby Smith, Warden of Belmont Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Marvin J. Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Fender
as 4:2024cv01283
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.