Ohio Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 958
Custer v. General Dynamics
as 3:2024cv01963
Plaintiff:
William Timothy Custer
Defendant:
General Dynamics
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Randolph v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv01636
Defendant:
Universal Screen Arts, Inc. and Universal Screen Arts Holdings, Inc
Plaintiff:
Autumn Randolph
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
Ebersole v. Dillon Companies LLC
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Kacey Ebersole
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr
Abel v. Marlin Manufacturing, et al.
as 1:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abel
Defendant:
Marlin Manufacturing Co. and Frederick Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roy v. KF Construction and Excavating, LLC
as 3:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Dallas Roy
Defendant:
KF Construction and Excavating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Stearns v. Capital City Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Steven Stearns
Defendant:
Capital City Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pearson v. Vesta Corporation
as 1:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Deidra Pearson
Defendant:
Vesta Corporation and Carswell Group, Inc. doing business as Independent Management Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Patel et al v. Wendy's International, LLC

as 2:2024cv03385
Defendant:
Wendy's International, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pujan Patel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Wagenschein v. CEDAR RIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 2:2024cv02449
Defendant:
CEDAR RIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ethan Wagenschein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Hooker v. Capri Gardens
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Ray Hooker
Defendant:
Capri Gardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.