US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 856
Dennis v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Lance A. Dennis
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele et al v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Mike Steele, Jacob Sewell, Aubrey Cole and others
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Florie v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Dondrea Jammal Florie, Sr.
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McDermott v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Green v. Harding
as 6:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Anthony Ryan Green
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burchett v. Bates
as 6:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Burchett
Respondent:
Tom Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cray v. Hamilton
as 6:2023cv00074
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Cray
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Norwood
as 6:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Eric S. Ray
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Harp
as 6:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Tyrone Jerrell Moore
Respondent:
Steven Harp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
